🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear Ruben Amorim endured defeat by Grimsby. He weathered an important continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home against domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at the executive and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director who having been part of the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when delivered by a man with the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – function on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Supreme Authority Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Soccer Order: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have such individuals set up? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.